Thursday, June 5, 2014

Death and Life

Visually, it’s easy to connect Gustav Klimt’s painting “Death and Life” to its title. Looking from left to right, the title of the piece delivers its promise: we first see a darkly robed skeletal figure, “death”, and our eyes then move to the right and come to rest upon the rosy-cheeked woman death has come to claim, as well as the billowing group of sleeping figures who envelope her, together representing “life”. As an artist of the Symbolist period, Klimt centered his painting around the grand and universally recognizable theme of mortality: the opposition of life and death. Many artists (and humans in general) have been fascinated with the portraying mortality. Gustave Klimt chose to depict the universally shared theme with his usual decorative and complex, yet balanced style. 


The solid green background of the painting recedes, and presents flat, undefined space, forcing us to focus on the shapes of life and death only. Death appears on the left as a vertical column robed in an eerie pattern of black crosses, and bears the hands and head of a skeleton. Clutching his scepter, death leers at “life”: the woman on the right. The woman’s face is placed on the center vertical axis of the painting (symbolically suggesting a border between death and life), and is part of a larger shape that extends behind her and almost fills the right half of the composition. Light-hued patterns hold the somewhat simplified, slumbering people behind the woman together, forming a distinct shape which balances death’s. 

In “Life and Death”, Klimt uses strong asymmetrical balance to dramatize the opposition between his two subjects. Although death occupies less physical space than life, their visual weight is equalized using two principles of balance. Life’s form is larger, but lighter in value, and death’s form is thinner, but rendered in much darker value, so our eye views them as balanced. Symbolism is the second key element which balances the two shapes. For the viewer, the idea of death (clearly displayed in the grave markers on the left-hand figure’s robe) carries more emotional weight, and contributes more subtly to the balance of the overall composition. 

Klimt also creates a striking stylistic balance in his use of abstract and representational forms. Although their nude bodies are simplified, the faces of the sleeping figures appear almost naturalistic in their accurate proportions and the careful shading of their features. The skull displays the same naturalistic quality because of its shading and detailed individual teeth. Klimt contrasts this quality with expressive abstraction throughout the rest of the painting in the form of detailed (and sometimes symbolic) pattern. These repetitive abstract patterns envelope and complement the detailed faces and lend a dreamlike quality to the piece, transforming the composition into two main forms of symbolic pattern against a simple backdrop. Klimt was careful to make the painting representational, but ensured that it could not be categorized as naturalistic because of the simplified bodies and obviously abstract patterns he utilized.

The gaze that passes between death and the woman whose life he has come to take links the two halves of the painting together. The implied line of sight between them pulls up toward the left corner of the composition, and Klimt balances this by bringing the shape on the right down and to the bottom right corner. This intense stare is also important symbolically. It represents the crossing of the often invisible line of mortality. The waking woman death has come for does not appear frightened, her open features display curiosity more than anything else. The men, women and child behind her (the “life” she is part of), all sleep soundly in their folds of bright, lively patterns, oblivious to the dark, cross-clad figure who has come for the woman who shares their world. The gesture of the woman’s hands imply an innocent inquiry, which death answers with his steady and morbid leer. 

In his interpretation of the interaction between the two sides of mortality, Klimt philosophizes on the delicacy of life itself, and how easily we can be swept away from it. He portrayed life and death equally, and showed the viewer how he imagined the decisive and macabre moment of their first meeting. Although precarious, there is a balance between the two concepts in Klimt’s composition, perhaps a subtle comment from the artist on the balance of life and death itself.

3 comments:

  1. It's an old motif Klimt's playing on. How would you compare his painting to the interpretations her: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_and_the_Maiden

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I think Klimt alters the old motif in a very subtle way. When looking at the older interpretations of the interaction between Death and "The Maiden" (a representation of the living), and Klimt's version, two differences really stand out to me: the distance between the two subjects, and the backdrop on which they are placed.

      It seems that in older, classical paintings from medieval to romantic eras (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_and_the_Maiden_(motif)), death is depicted in the process of snatching the maiden away, actively and brusquely taking her life. In Hans Baldung Grien's version of the motif (1517), a shriveled, mummy-like figure roughly hauls the maiden away by her hair while she clasps her hands in a desperate plea. A darkly cloaked death wraps its cold skeletal fingers around the soft flesh of the young woman in Adolf Hering's interpretation (1900). However, in Klimt's painting there seems to be a sort of palpable distance between death and life, and we, as the viewer, get the sense that she is about to leave the world of the living, but that her departure has not yet taken place. Death beckons to her with a knowing look, not a coarse physical grab. He clutches a scepter instead, perhaps foreshadowing her fate.

      Klimt's work also differs from that of his predecessors in the background he chose for the interaction. Instead of selecting a distinctly physical space for Death and The Maiden, he chose to depict them on an indefinite green backdrop. Living people surround The Maiden, giving her context in the composition. We cannot mistake another figure for The Maiden -- she is the only one with open eyes, the only one aware of Death's presence. I suppose in Klimt's symbol-oriented mind, Death needs no context. The possibility of it's arrival always looms over us. Maybe that's why the motif has stood the test of time -- when it comes down to it, one day we will all be The Maiden.

      Delete